Earthquake-prone buildings include the Masterton Bowling Club, St Andrew's Church in Upper Plain Rd, and St Matthew's Church. Photo: LDR / Supplied
Masterton has 79 earthquake-prone buildings, with some needing strengthening work by as early as 2026.
Deputy mayor Bex Johnson said she was worried some owners might walk away, leaving council responsible for either fixing or demolishing the buildings.
Masterton District Council recently finished its audit of earthquake-prone building notices and confirmed how many need fixing.
The public register of Masterton's earthquake-prone buildings includes the Masterton Bowling Club, St Andrew's Church in Upper Plain Rd, and St Matthew's Church in Church St.
A report to Wednesday's MDC infrastructure and services committee meeting confirmed the district's currently registered affected buildings were now all displaying notices in a prominent place.
The owners must fix their buildings within a given timeframe, so they are no longer earthquake prone.
"In instances where owners have not fixed their building, the Building Act sets the expectation that the council will remove any danger to building users and the public," the report said.
"Council will incur significant costs to remove potential danger to the public and building users.
"While we can put a charge on the land to recover costs, it's unlikely full recovery of costs will be achieved."
Council's Long Term Plan will need to include financial provision for the work.
Johnson said she was concerned about what might happen if some building owners did not discharge their obligations.
Options for the council include installing hoardings around them, doing the strengthening work itself and recovering the cost from the owner, or starting proceedings to have the building demolished.
"We've got 79 earthquake-prone buildings in Masterton, with the first [notice] due to expire in 2026.
"We also know under the Building Act that if those people walk away, council is up for demolition or rebuilding," Johnson said.
"That really worries me. I'm wondering if we can be proactive with this, not reactive, and whether we are having early conversations with the building owners so that we can perhaps identify those that are going to walk away."
Johnson said the question could impact ratepayers. Alternatively, it could affect rejuvenation plans for the CBD if some buildings were not going to be there.
"I just wonder whether we can have earlier conversations rather than be caught by surprise."
The council's manager regulatory services, Steven May, said there was an opportunity to plan for this.
"We have got a little bit of time, but it's a short period of time, and we will need that time to develop a policy and a strategy of engagement," he said.
Public Interest Journalism funded through NZ On Air
